|
Page 1 of 8 2007 Australian Federal Election seat predictions have been made by establishing trends of the Two Party Preferred votes in each seat against the state Two Party Preferred vote. These trends have then been applied to the September 2007 quarterly Newspoll results to predict which seats might change hands on November 24th.
Examining the Two Party Preferred (2PP) results for the House of Representatives from the previous four Australian Federal elections can indicate that most seats have a similar fraction of the overall state 2PP votes over time. Using election data from the 1996, 1998, 2001 and 2004 federal elections enables comparisons between seat 2PP results and the overall results in that particular state. The percentage results for each seat have been averaged and a standard deviation has been computed. Applying this test to a given 2PP result (say, from the September 2007 quarterly Newspoll, which gave 2PP scores for each state) then gives a range of possible 2PP results at the November 24, 2007 federal election. This range is calculated to be the computed mean fraction of the statewide 2PP, plus or minus the computed standard deviation of the fraction of the statewide 2PP. Examples
To illustrate this approach, let’s look at some seats in New South Wales, and let’s take the ALP 2PP numbers as our benchmark: | | 1996 | % | 1998 | % | 2001 | % | 2004 | % | Mean | S.D. | | NSW ALP 2PP | 47.3 | | 51.9 | | 49.5 | | 47.7 | | | | | Bennelong | 39.9 | 84.3 | 44.0 | 84.8 | 42.3 | 85.4 | 45.7 | 95.9 | 87.6 | 4.8 | | Eden-Monaro | 45.2 | 95.5 | 49.8 | 96.0 | 48.3 | 97.5 | 47.9 | 100.5 | 97.4 | 1.9 | | Macarthur | 39.3 | 83.1 | 44.4 | 85.6 | 43.3 | 87.4 | 40.5 | 85.0 | 85.3 | 1.6 | | North Sydney | 34.4 | 72.7 | 37.8 | 72.9 | 36.8 | 74.3 | 40.0 | 83.9 | 76.0 | 4.6 | Note: the ALP 2PP numbers above are averaged over all seats. They are NOT the actual 2PP vote recorded in the state for that election. In the examples above, whatever the NSW ALP 2PP statewide result is, Bennelong will be between 82.8 and 92.4% of that, while Eden-Monaro will be between 95.5 and 99.3%. Macarthur will be between 83.7 and 86.9% of the statewide ALP 2PP, and North Sydney will be between 71.4 and 80.6% . From these numbers alone, it is easy to see why Eden-Monaro is considered the “bellwether” of the federal election, given that it closely follows the national 2PP and doesn’t vary much. Applying the method Using the above method, we can construct a series of percentage ranges for the each seat versus the ALP 2PP in the states. Putting the statewide 2PP results in from the most recent Newspoll then gives a range of 2PP results for each seat. From this range, if the high and low bounds are both greater than 50%, we can say that the seat will be an ALP gain (or retain). If the low bound is below 50%, and the high bound is above 50%, but by a further margin (say 48.2 to 56.7%, for instance), we can say that the seat is a Likely ALP gain (or retain). If the low bound is below 50% by a wider margin than the upper bound (say, 44.5 to 51.2) we can say that the seat is a Likely Coalition gain (or retain) and finally, if both low and high bounds are below 50%, we can say that the seat is a Coalition gain (or retain).
Applying these standards to the September Newspoll 2PP for the ALP in New South Wales gives the following results: | | Low bound | High bound | Predicted result | | NSW ALP 2PP: 58% | | | | | Bennelong | 46.0 | 55.6 | Likely ALP gain | | Eden-Monaro | 54.4 | 58.4 | ALP gain | | Macarthur | 47.9 | 51.0 | Likely Coalition retain | | North Sydney | 39.4 | 48.7 | Coalition retain | Predictions We can now use this criterion on all seats in the country, and determine where gains (or losses) will be made, and what the likely changeover of seats will be if the latest quarterly Newspoll figures (as an example) are repeated on election day. Using those figures, we get the results in the table below. Note that “Likely coalition retain” means that the coalition will probably hold that seat, but there is a chance that the ALP can win it. Please also note that of course there are local issues at stake, particularly with members retiring (e.g. Lindsay, Grey) that can affect the result.
Alarmingly for the Coalition, there are NO seats in which there is even a chance, on these criteria that the Coalition will gain any seats from the ALP. | ALP 2PP | ALP gain | Likely ALP gain | Likely coalition retain | | NSW: 58% | Dobell | Bennelong | Gilmore | | | Eden-Monaro | Cowper | Hughes | | | Greenway | Macquarie | Macarthur | | | Lindsay | Robertson | Parkes | | | Page | Wentworth | Warringah | | | Paterson | | | | # of seats | 6 | 5 | 5 | | VIC: 60% | Deakin | Casey | Flinders | | | La Trobe | Corangamite | Gippsland | | | McEwen | Dunkley | Higgins | | | McMillan | | | | # of seats | 4 | 3 | 3 | | QLD: 52% | Bonner | Bowman | Blair | | | Herbert | Dawson | Fairfax | | | Hinkler | Dickson | Forde | | | Moreton | Leichhardt | Ryan | | | Petrie | Longman | Wide Bay | | # of seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | | WA: 49% | Hasluck | Canning | Curtin | | | | Stirling | | | # of seats | 1 | 2 | 1 | | SA: 55% | Kingston | Boothby | Grey | | | Makin | Sturt | | | | Wakefield | | | | # of seats | 3 | 2 | 1 | | TAS: 66% | Bass | | | | | Braddon | | | | # of seats | 2 | 0 | 0 | | ACT: 72% | (no seats) | | | | NT: 62% | Solomon | | | | # of seats | 1 | 0 | 0 | | | | | | | TOTAL | 22 | 17 | 15 | NOTES: Redistributions in seats have NOT been taken into account at this time; however refer to the next note (#2). The seats of Bonner and Wakefield have been included based on their 2004 result only. Bonner was a new seat in 2004. Wakefield had significant redistribution in 2004 due to the demise of Bonython, so much so that the 1996-2001 data for this seat had to be discounted. Other seats suffering less extravagant redistribution, such as Bennelong, Macquarie and Parramatta have been left as is. The new seat of Flynn is not considered since there is no previous election data for this seat.
Analysis These numbers indicate defeat for the Lib-NP Coalition if the above 2PP poll results are repeated on November 24th. The ALP needs 16 seats to form government, and from the above table, they will gain at least 22, likely 39, and possibly up to 54 seats. - Scott McCamish Sources:
Views: 5598
1. Written by Rob, on 23-10-2007 08:05 Uhhh, don't like your methodology here. For instance, the Bennelong of 2007 is not the Bennelong of 2004. ALP also look set to lose seats. State poll numbers are also very unreliable.
|
2. Written by
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
, on 24-10-2007 11:47 Rob, I wanted to use a granular approach by looking at trends in individual seats, rather than applying a uniform swing across the entire nation, or even across a given state. I feel that is too innacurate in terms of predicting seat numbers. I agree that electorates such as Bennelong do change over time with re-distribution. I have tried to account for that in electorates such as Wakefield by only counting election results that have been registered since a major distribution has occurred. I have been gradually refining my method over the last few weeks. My state numbers are now derived from the national 2PP trend, instead of using the Newspoll results. Feel free to refer to the prevailing method in other calculators (e.g. Anthony Green's), which applies uniform swings across all seats, regardless. This is just another way of looking at it. We will see how well it performs after November 24th.
|
3. Written by
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
, on 24-10-2007 11:50 Also, can you explain which seats you think Labor will lose, and why? Labor's vote is low in WA - we know that. Even so, my model did not produce any possible gains for the Coalition over there. the vote was already low in 2004, so if the ALP gets 49% there, it'll be a swing TO them. One final point - I am not aiming to predict the results of all seats 100% accurately. I'm looking for a final seat count, figuring that I will miss on some seats, but gain on others, and hopefully come up with the right number by applying the opinion poll average in the last week of the campaign.
|
4. Written by
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
, on 27-10-2007 04:28 I'm not sure where you get your ALP 2pp from. In 2004 the NSW ALP 2PP was 48.1. Nationally it was 47.3. Your numbers for earlier elections are also out of sync.
|
5. Written by
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
, on 27-10-2007 07:17 Shane, the ALP 2PP numbers are averages of the seat 2PP numbers. It doesn't particularly matter for the purposes of this analysis. The basis for this trend is the relation between the seat vote and the average 2PP vote for the state. It doesn't particularly matter that the actual vote 2PP is different. I will change it or make a note to clear this up. Thanks for the comment 
|
|